. >> for them to go after the un ambassador who had nothing to do with benghazi, and was simply making a aren't presentation she had receive besirch her representation is outous. >> outrageous? if she had nothing to do with benghazi why did you send her out? why not the secretary secretary or the other people above rice? might this have been a dress rehearsal it test whether she could follow the make believe narratives and by the way, to me is outrageous is a so called professional repeating a story and conclusion five timos national television and without the facts. wule know you had the facts. the intelligence and she could have readly acessed those facts. but enough about that. and this week your then cia director david petraeus finally talks and said his intelligence report was scrubbed. with so who scrubbed it and changed it. i will not hold my breath on that one. and why would the good general send an intelemeeting back on september 14th. promote a video nonsense? and then stay silent for six weeks while the nation debated and the families waited. why not come out and say, i didn